MIS 752 · Lab 7
Catch the AI Lying: an audited pass/fail harness for one small free model
Ten clinical gold questions · exact match, contains check and two judge passes · saved notebook results
The 30-second read
THE GOLD STANDARD
items : 10 self-contained clinical questions
file : data/gold_qa.csv
ACCURACY ON THE SAME 10 ITEMS, THREE RULERS
exact match : 9/10 = 90%
contains gold : 8/10 = 80%
judge, pass A : 7/10 = 70%
judge, pass B : 6/10 = 60%
IS THE JUDGE ITSELF RELIABLE?
judge vs itself : agreement 60%, kappa 0.20
exact vs judge A : agreement 80%, kappa 0.4444
judge failures : pass A 2/10, pass B 4/10
API cost reported: $0
IMPORTANT PROVENANCE
This run includes API errors (including rate limits).
UNPARSEABLE means no valid judgment; it is not a clinical FAIL.
Saved notebook output was used to reconstruct these tables.
Full original answer text and raw judge reasons were not recoverable.
This is not a clinical validation.
Your judge contradicted itself
Judge pass A and pass B agreed on six of ten items. Four changed verdict, frequently because of unparseable API calls; this is not evidence of four contradictory clinical decisions.
The two rulers disagree
Exact match passed nine answers; judge A passed seven. The 20-point gap includes two unparseable judge calls, not two confirmed clinical errors.
The pass/fail table
id type gold answer exact_verdict judge_a score_a judge_b score_b judge_repeated scorers_agree
icd10_t2dm code_lookup E11.9 E11.9 PASS UNPARSEABLE PASS 10.0 False False
icd10_ami code_lookup I21.9 I21.9 PASS PASS 10.0 UNPARSEABLE False True
snomed_t2dm code_lookup 44054006 44054006 PASS PASS 10.0 PASS 10.0 True True
acetaminophen_max_g numeric 4 4 PASS PASS 10.0 PASS 10.0 True True
a1c_8_eag_mgdl numeric 183 183 PASS PASS 10.0 PASS 10.0 True True
hypo_level1_mgdl numeric 70 FAIL FAIL 0.0 UNPARSEABLE False True
hipaa_safe_harbor numeric 18 18 PASS PASS 10.0 PASS 10.0 True True
warfarin_reversal_agent short_phrase 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate Prothrombin complex concentrate PASS UNPARSEABLE UNPARSEABLE True False
sjw_warfarin_yesno yes_no NO NO PASS PASS 10.0 PASS 10.0 True True
atorva80_intensity one_word high high-intensity PASS PASS 10.0 UNPARSEABLE False True
Auditing the instrument
exact_verdict PASS FAIL UNPARSEABLE
FAIL 0 1 0
PASS 7 0 2
Week 4 re-scoring
No Week 4 answers.csv was available in the uploaded notebook results. No re-scoring evidence is included.
How this was measured
Ten gold questions were scored with exact matching and a model judge twice. The notebook records 60% self-agreement (κ = 0.20) and 80% exact-vs-judge agreement (κ = 0.4444). Rate-limit failures make the pass percentages incomplete. This is a teaching pilot, not a clinical evaluation. ChatGPT provided partial assistance in preparing the published files.